* Disclaimer - If ad is a click thru and you are having problems please click on link to download latest version of flash player.Flash Player

ON THE WEBSITE:

• HORSE RESCUE: Couple helps horses find homes
• FIRST AID: The basic info
• BIKE-A-THON: Edisto team surpasses goal
• NO BULL: OCSD 5 denies bullying
• PATH TO THE DRAFT: Diary of Ricky Sapp

Advanced Search
You are not logged in. | Login | Register

Log in to TheTandD.com

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?
 

STATE: Report says SC foster care needs improvement

By The Associated Press  Thursday, February 19, 2004

4 comment(s) | Default | Large

COLUMBIA, S.C. (AP) -- The state Department of Social Services has failed six of seven measures in a federal study on the foster care system, including workers underestimating risks to abused and neglected children and leaving young victims in foster homes too long.

The federal study, which blames the state agency as well as judges, schools and mental health providers for the failures, looked at whether children in the system were kept healthy and safe.

In one case, a child was inappropriately placed with a grandparent who had a criminal record and health troubles, the report said. In another, workers' assessment failed to identify a family's domestic violence history.

Federal review teams studied 50 sample cases in three South Carolina counties involving foster children or families under investigation for child maltreatment. In a quarter of the cases, social workers failed to see children frequently enough to ensure their safety -- sometimes visiting less than once a month. Workers also failed to accurately address the risk of harm to children in 24 percent of the cases.

But DSS said the study's scope was too narrow. The agency investigates about 18,000 abuse or neglect complaints a year.

Human services director Mary Williams said the review of only 50 cases in Greenville, Lexington and Marion counties does not give regulators a picture of the entire system.

Federal officials, however, said they looked at statewide statistics, too, and choosing a small number of cases allowed them to examine each in depth.

Deep budget cuts have already limited services South Carolina provides, the federal report said. The DSS budget, which also includes food stamps and welfare, has dropped by a quarter since the fiscal year that began in 2000 -- to $88 million from $120 million.

None of the 39 states reviewed by the study has met every federal measure, and South Carolina, like other states, must improve or face losing federal funding for programs.

Federal regulators this spring will check to see if the state made adequate improvement. South Carolina could lose $726,000 if it fails to meet progress goals.

The state's proposal calls for better staff training, monitoring of casework and collaboration with other state agencies and courts, Williams said.

Agency officials don't know how much the improvement plan will cost overall, but they're asking legislators to increase adoption funding by $575,000 this year.

"We just know this is something that will help us improve our practices and what's good for kids," Williams said.

South Carolina performed well on some tasks. In the sample case reviews, the agency responded promptly to reports of abuse and neglect. DSS also did well helping foster children make the transition to independent living as adults.

The agency did worst in adoption, failing to move children quickly enough from foster homes to adoptive families. Statewide, DSS completed adoption within two years in just 14 percent of cases.

Federal standards require that at least 32 percent of children settle into adoptive homes within two years. High staff turnover and the loss of DSS attorneys due to budget cuts have contributed to delays in adoptions, the report said.

To subscribe to the print edition of The Times and Democrat, click here.

 
4 comment(s)
The following comments are reader submitted. They do not represent the views of The T&D or Lee Enterprises.

Marcos Aviles wrote on Jan 27, 2007 8:43 AM:

" The heartbreaking true story of the crash of the united flight 93 is very sad. May all those victims rest in peace, but know this,"we will fight against terrorism until the day we die!" Marcos aviles 5th Grade 11 years old "

Ed wrote on Dec 6, 2006 7:16 PM:

" I have always eaten farm raised hog and I never get sick! Its just another way for the government to control the peoples money. Just keep jumping on the little guy trying to make an honest living...Are we really FREE anymore???Why cant people just mind their own business? Inspections from the USDA have failed in the past and many people have gotten sick from "inspected" meat It doesnt make me feel better knowing that our government looks out for our health. Bottom line>MONEY thats why we cant make moonshine legally:) "

ninasoto@sbcglobal.com wrote on May 4, 2006 10:53 PM:

" why is it that someone always has to come up with their own conclusions and if the rest of the world doesn't agree and chose to believe what really happened, flight 93 went down and the total fault goes to the muslims not to our government, fbi cia or who ever else they crased the plane and killed all those three thousand people. what we are guilty of was not being prepared and look what they did and did it with box cutters and mace oh and a so called fake bomb. no one was prepared all our guards were down and this monster knew it. stop blaming the wrong people. this guy or woman that wrote that is probably a muslim anyway. "

Anynamous wrote on Apr 18, 2006 2:27 PM:

" I think this story has been written in a very biased way. I have a feeling some other things happened that would make it so this story would get less simpathy. If you would like to get the rest of the story I suggest that you look at some of the other sites on this. "



» Post a comment Thanks for your comment! Once approved, your comment will appear on the site.

You must be logged in to comment.

Click Here To Sign in

Click here to get an account
it's free and quick
Please note: The Times and Democrat provides our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.




More Pm